{ "@context": "http:\/\/schema.org", "@type": "Article", "image": "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.diariosergipano.net\/wp-content\/s\/2025\/05\/ljl-l-ADU-2021.jpg?w=150&strip=all", "headline": "ADUs not \u2018unpopular\u2019 with this fan of added local housing", "datePublished": "2025-05-16 10:05:17", "author": { "@type": "Person", "workLocation": { "@type": "Place" }, "Point": { "@type": "Point", "Type": "Journalist" }, "sameAs": [ "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.diariosergipano.net\/author\/gqlshare\/" ], "name": "gqlshare" } } Skip to content
A rendering depicts an accessory dwelling unit planned for La Jolla in 2021. (File)
A rendering depicts an accessory dwelling unit planned for La Jolla in 2021. (File)
Author
PUBLISHED:

Re “San Diego’s unpopular ADU incentive ‘has been exploited’ by developers, needs ‘guardrails,’ planners say” (May 1): I saw your recent article on the ”unpopular” ADU incentive program. I live in Mira Mesa, and I’ve seen a bunch of ADUs of various sizes go up in my neighborhood — and I think they’re great! San Diego desperately needs more housing — especially affordable housing — and if people are willing to spend their own money to literally build it in their own back yard (the ultimate in “YIMBY”), we should both allow and encourage that.

— Regan Myers, Mira Mesa

 

RevContent Feed

Events