{ "@context": "http:\/\/schema.org", "@type": "Article", "image": "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.diariosergipano.net\/wp-content\/s\/migration\/2024\/06\/07\/00000186-eb8d-d8cf-af96-eb8dd6ff0000.jpg?w=150&strip=all", "headline": "Push for sharply increased housing density can't be squared with population forecasts", "datePublished": "2024-06-07 12:00:18", "author": { "@type": "Person", "workLocation": { "@type": "Place" }, "Point": { "@type": "Point", "Type": "Journalist" }, "sameAs": [ "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.diariosergipano.net\/author\/z_temp\/" ], "name": "Migration Temp" } } Skip to content

Push for sharply increased housing density can’t be squared with population forecasts

Our leaders know that population declines are coming. Why does this not seem to affect their decisions?

New Apartments 2023<br/><br/>Name: Simone<br/>Address: 1401 Union St., San Diego<br/>Units: 395<br/>Submarket: Near Little Italy
The San Diego Union-Tribune
New Apartments 2023Name: SimoneAddress: 1401 Union St., San DiegoUnits: 395Submarket: Near Little Italy
AuthorAuthor
UPDATED:

There have been dueling headlines the past two years. One set says the San Diego region and California are losing population as people seek more affordable areas. Another set says San Diego population increases require a more dense urban plan.

We lived in University City for over 40 years and witnessed the changes both good and bad in the neighborhood. Further density is clearly misguided and likely driven by developer pressures on politicians. Planners say our population growth will be net zero by 2040 followed by decreases. So why are city and county leaders making density a priority when studies show it won’t be needed in the future?

— Thomas Glasrud, Lakeside 

Originally Published:

RevContent Feed

Events